← BACK TO ARTICLELAW & JUSTICE
September 14, 2026 · American Frontline News Staff
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration's emergency request to reinstate new U.S. Postal Service requirements for handling mail-in ballots, leaving a lower court's nationwide injunction in place ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The brief order found...
READ FULL ARTICLE →GROUND RULES
Speak your mind — that’s why we built this. But keep it civil. No threats, no slurs, no doxxing. Attack the argument, not the person. If you can’t say it at a town hall, don’t say it here.
DISCUSSION
2 commentsCarolyn ReevesSep 15, 2026 at 12:08 PM
The only people who object to this are those who want to cheat/control the outcome.
naomi kaneSep 15, 2026 at 11:52 AM
I can only tell you of my experience in the 2020 election. I received 4 mail in ballots that I had not requested. Two were intended for me and two others were for strangers. I threw them all out. It's unlikely I was the only one who received these mail in ballots, and that begs the question, how many more were sent to people around the country? This example alone, shows how incompetent or deliberate the mail in process is. There were many instances that were reported, questioning the validity of the election process. I'm appalled by the Supreme Court being so uninformed or unwilling to investigate further. If I, a citizen of the U.S. could see something was very wrong with the process, why aren't they? The result of unrequested mail in ballots means anyone could have filled them out and affected the election.
