California’s nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office flagged roughly $2 billion in budget accounting errors tied to the state’s public employee retirement system as early as February, but state legislative leaders kept the problem under wraps for months while publicly debating deficits built on flawed numbers, Fox News Digital reported.
The issue did not surface publicly until April, when KCRA 3 reported on a memo detailing the miscalculations. By then, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration and top lawmakers had spent weeks discussing a budget shaped by figures they knew were wrong.
The errors involve two separate miscalculations in retirement contributions owed to CalPERS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System. The analyst’s office found that the Newsom administration double-counted some retirement contribution rates, producing a $1.6 billion overstatement. A second miscalculation involving future contribution estimates added another $450 million. Together, the errors total roughly $2 billion, a sum large enough to reshape the state’s deficit picture.
Newsom’s January spending plan projected a roughly $3 billion deficit for the coming fiscal year. In its January overview of that budget, the Legislative Analyst’s Office pegged the projected shortfall at $2.9 billion for 2026-27. If the $2 billion in miscalculations is corrected, the gap between revenue and spending could shrink considerably, meaning the fiscal crisis Sacramento spent months debating may have been substantially overstated from the start.
That does not mean California’s finances are healthy. Far from it.
The same January overview warned that the state faces multiyear deficits ranging from $20 billion to $35 billion annually. The analyst’s office called those long-term projections “alarming” and raised serious concerns about California’s fiscal sustainability. The report also noted that Newsom’s budget was only “roughly balanced” because it relied on higher revenue assumptions, and warned that a potential stock market downturn could sharply cut income tax revenue and put the state on even more precarious footing.
California’s track record of fiscal mismanagement extends well beyond budget spreadsheets. The state’s high-speed rail project now carries a $126 billion price tag with no track laid after nearly two decades, a monument to the gap between Sacramento’s promises and its results.
The Newsom administration pushed back against calling the issue an error at all. Department of Finance spokesman H.D. Palmer told KCRA 3:
“This isn’t a calculation error. It’s a revision to better estimate how these payments are made.”
That framing strains credibility. The analyst’s office, a nonpartisan body whose job is to check the administration’s math, described double-counted contribution rates and a separate miscalculation on future estimates. Calling a $1.6 billion double-count a “revision” is the kind of word game that erodes public trust in government budgeting.
Legislative Analyst Gabe Petek struck a more measured tone, acknowledging the problem while defending his office’s role in catching it:
“Given the size and complexity of [California’s budget], it is not uncommon that we come across errors stemming from calculation mistakes or formula errors etc.”
Petek added that serving as a check on the administration’s budget calculations is “part of the role of our office.” He said the issue is expected to be corrected in Newsom’s updated May budget proposal.
The timeline is what makes this episode so damaging. In January, Newsom released a spending plan with a roughly $3 billion deficit projection. By February, the Legislative Analyst’s Office had flagged the $2 billion problem to state legislative leaders. Yet for the next two months, lawmakers conducted budget hearings and deficit discussions without disclosing the accounting issue to the public.
Assemblyman David Tangipa did not mince words. The New York Post reported his assessment of the situation:
“This administration continues its track record of lacking transparency, preferring to keep the legislature and the public in the dark.”
That charge lands harder when you consider the pattern. California’s Democratic leadership has repeatedly asked taxpayers to accept painful trade-offs, spending cuts, fee increases, deferred projects, in the name of closing budget gaps. If the gap was overstated by $2 billion because of sloppy math that insiders knew about, every policy argument built on those numbers was built on sand.
The broader pattern of delayed accountability among California’s Democratic leadership is not new. Lawmakers in Sacramento have a habit of managing bad news on their own schedule, whether the subject is misconduct accusations involving sitting members of Congress or billion-dollar budget holes.
Lawmakers are expected to ramp up budget negotiations next month when Newsom releases his revised spending plan. Petek said the CalPERS-related errors should be corrected in that May proposal. But the correction itself raises uncomfortable questions. If the deficit shrinks by $2 billion on paper, does Sacramento use the breathing room to address its long-term structural problems, or does it simply spend the windfall and kick the can further down the road?
The analyst’s office has already answered that question in advance, at least implicitly. Its warning of annual deficits between $20 billion and $35 billion makes clear that California’s fiscal trajectory is unsustainable regardless of whether one year’s shortfall is $3 billion or $1 billion. The state’s reliance on volatile income tax revenue from high earners and stock market gains leaves it exposed to any downturn.
That structural vulnerability is compounded by the political incentives at work in blue-state capitals, where leaders have shown a consistent willingness to push aggressive new taxes on the wealthy while the bill lands on everyone else.
Fox News Digital reached out to the governor’s office, the Department of Finance, and the Legislative Analyst’s Office for comment on the months-long gap between discovery and disclosure. The responses, or lack thereof, will say a great deal about whether Sacramento treats this as a serious transparency failure or a bookkeeping footnote.
A $2 billion error in a state budget is not a rounding issue. It is not a “revision.” It is the kind of mistake that, in the private sector, would trigger audits, terminations, and lawsuits. In Sacramento, it triggered months of silence followed by bureaucratic euphemism.
California taxpayers deserve to know the real numbers when their elected officials are making decisions about spending, cuts, and taxes. They did not get that here. They got a budget built on double-counted pension contributions, a deficit projection inflated by nearly $2 billion, and leaders who sat on the problem while publicly wringing their hands over a fiscal crisis that was partly of their own making.
The question now is whether anyone in Sacramento’s accountability-averse political class will face real consequences, or whether this gets folded into the May revision and forgotten by June.
When the people running the budget can’t count to $2 billion, and the people who caught the mistake don’t tell the public for two months, the problem isn’t arithmetic. It’s governance.
By signing up, you agree to receive our newsletters and promotional content and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.