A former executive assistant to Howard Stern and his wife Beth has filed a lawsuit alleging the radio host fostered a hostile work environment, and she wants a court to throw out a non-disclosure agreement she says was used to keep her quiet about what happened inside the couple’s 20,000-square-foot Southampton mansion.
Leslie Kuhn, who says she managed household staff, payroll, scheduling, and day-to-day operations for the Sterns, filed the suit in New York County Supreme Court against Howard Stern, Beth Stern, The Howard Stern Production Company, and One Twelve Inc., the Washington Times reported. The complaint paints a picture of a chaotic domestic operation driven in part by Beth Stern’s on-site cat rescue and fostering efforts, and of an employer who, Kuhn alleges, responded to her concerns by firing her.
The case lands at an awkward moment for Stern, who in recent years has traded his shock-jock persona for a more polished progressive brand. He endorsed Kamala Harris for president and publicly claimed he canceled his Disney+ subscription to support Jimmy Kimmel. Now the man who once built a career on boundary-pushing is accused of crossing boundaries with the people who worked for him.
Kuhn says she initially worked as office manager for The Howard Stern Show before becoming Stern’s executive assistant in January 2024. She later took on expanded duties managing the couple’s Southampton household operations, as Breitbart reported. That role, she says, included handling issues tied to Beth Stern’s at-home cat rescue and fostering operation, an arrangement Kuhn describes in blunt terms in her complaint.
The lawsuit references what Kuhn calls:
“Hostile work environment and enablement of that hostile work environment, immense pressures on the household created by irresponsible and untenable animal rescue and fostering operations occurring on-site, and massively disorganized and questionable business operations and accounting practices.”
Stern allegedly demanded that Kuhn move into the sprawling Southampton mansion. The complaint does not detail every grievance, in part because Kuhn says she is constrained by a supposed NDA, one she is now asking the court to invalidate.
The non-disclosure agreement is central to Kuhn’s legal strategy. She argues the document is unenforceable, claiming her purported signature on the agreement is not a genuine signature at all. In her filing, Kuhn describes what appears on the page as nothing more than “her typewritten name in the same font style and size used to identify the parties’ names in the recitals of the agreement.”
If a court agrees, the NDA falls, and Kuhn would be free to disclose far more about her time working for the Sterns. That prospect alone raises the stakes for Stern’s legal team, which has not publicly responded to the allegations.
Celebrity lawsuits involving NDAs and workplace allegations have become a recurring feature of New York’s courts. In a separate high-profile dispute, a New York judge recently dismissed Blake Lively’s sexual harassment claims against Justin Baldoni in a major pretrial ruling, a reminder that filing a complaint and prevailing in court are two very different things.
One detail in the Washington Times account sharpens the timeline considerably. Kuhn says she received a letter in December promising a raise to $265,000 and an $80,000 bonus for 2026. Two months later, in February, she was fired. The lawsuit does not specify what triggered the termination, but Kuhn alleges it came after she raised concerns about the hostile conditions and disorganized business practices she had witnessed.
That sequence, a raise letter followed shortly by a firing, will likely become a contested point. Employers have broad discretion over at-will employees in New York. But Kuhn’s attorneys appear to be framing her as someone who spoke up and paid the price.
Kuhn herself leans into that framing. She describes herself in the filing as “a mere at-will employee with considerably less influence and resources than the Sterns,” and argues the court should void the NDA on that basis.
Beth Stern’s animal rescue work is well known. She has promoted her cat fostering operation publicly for years. But Kuhn’s complaint casts it in a different light, as a source of “immense pressures on the household” that contributed to the allegedly hostile conditions. The lawsuit references the operation as “irresponsible and untenable.”
Whether a cat rescue can constitute a legally cognizable workplace hazard is an open question. But Kuhn’s attorneys are clearly using it to illustrate broader dysfunction, a household where personal passion projects, questionable accounting, and employee management all collided under one very expensive roof.
Several key questions hang over this case. Neither Howard Stern nor Beth Stern has publicly responded to the allegations. The specific court docket number has not been widely reported. And it remains unclear whether Kuhn seeks monetary damages beyond the declaratory relief on the NDA.
TMZ first reported details of Kuhn’s claims. The case will likely generate more coverage as it moves through the New York court system, particularly if the NDA is struck down and Kuhn is free to speak without legal restraint.
For now, the lawsuit stands as an accusation, not a verdict. Courts will sort the facts. But the allegations themselves tell a familiar story: a powerful figure who demands loyalty and silence, and a former employee who decided she had endured enough of both.
Stern spent decades making a fortune by saying whatever he wanted. He may find it less comfortable when someone else exercises the same right.
By signing up, you agree to receive our newsletters and promotional content and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.