Federal prosecutors on Thursday filed a firearm charge against the illegal immigrant accused of gunning down 18-year-old Loyola University Chicago student Sheridan Gorman, a move one criminal defense attorney says reflects Washington’s distrust of how Chicago handles violent crime. The charge of illegal firearm possession carries up to 10 years in federal prison and lands on top of state-level counts of murder, attempted murder, aggravated assault, aggravated discharge of a firearm, and illegal possession of a weapon already pending against 25-year-old Jose Medina-Medina.
U.S. Attorney Boutros made the reasoning plain. As Fox News Digital reported, Boutros said in a statement:
“Given the senseless, cold-blooded nature of the murder of a young student with a bright future ahead of her, the Chicago U.S. Attorney’s Office will take no chances that this illegal alien perpetrator will be released back into our community.”
That language, “will take no chances”, tells you everything about how federal law enforcement views the state system in Cook County. And a local criminal defense attorney spelled out the subtext even more bluntly.
Donna Rotunno, a Chicago criminal defense attorney, told Fox News Digital she believed federal prosecutors filed the new charge because they do not trust the local process to deliver accountability. Rotunno pointed to Chicago’s track record:
“Blue cities historically are lighter in their prosecutions. We have already heard that this person was of diminished capacity, so we are probably going to see some defense in regard to that.”
She added her own read of the federal strategy:
“My guess is the feds wanted to jump in so they can have some control over the fate of the defendant.”
The concern is not hypothetical. Medina-Medina’s own defense attorney has already laid groundwork for a diminished-capacity argument, telling the court that Medina-Medina was shot in the head in Colombia, suffered loss of a portion of his brain and skull, has the brain development of a child, cannot read or write, suffers from epilepsy, and still has bullet fragments lodged in his brain. The defense attorney also said Medina-Medina had requested to be sent back to Colombia and contracted tuberculosis during his time in a shelter, a detail that delayed his detention hearing.
A judge ultimately ordered Medina-Medina detained pending trial. But the fact that federal prosecutors felt the need to add a parallel charge speaks to a deeper institutional failure, one that began long before March 19.
The Department of Homeland Security confirmed that Jose Medina-Medina, a Venezuelan national, first entered the United States in 2023. He was apprehended and then released into the country under the Biden administration. His defense attorney said he turned himself in at the Texas border, was held in detention, and was later released.
Court documents obtained by Fox News Digital show that after his release, Medina-Medina told officials he was living at the Leone Beach Park fieldhouse in Rogers Park, a facility the city of Chicago was using as a sponsored shelter for migrants.
Then came the first arrest that should have changed everything. In 2023, Medina-Medina was charged with shoplifting after he allegedly stole just over $130 in merchandise from a Macy’s in downtown Chicago. He was released. He then failed to appear for court hearings related to that case. An arrest warrant remained active, unserved, until the night Sheridan Gorman was killed.
The Washington Examiner noted the pattern plainly: the suspect was released into the country in 2023, later arrested for shoplifting, and released again rather than deported. Every off-ramp that could have prevented this tragedy was ignored.
The Washington Times reported that DHS asked Illinois and Chicago officials to honor an ICE detainer after the murder charge, while noting that state law limits transfers to ICE without a federal warrant, another layer of legal obstruction that sanctuary jurisdictions impose between federal agents and criminal suspects.
Prosecutors described the killing during a detention hearing. In the early morning hours of March 19, Sheridan Gorman was with friends at a pier in the Rogers Park neighborhood of Chicago. She walked toward a lighthouse, looked around it, and saw Medina-Medina there.
Gorman walked back toward her friends and mouthed the words: “There’s a man behind the lighthouse.”
The group ran. Prosecutors said Gorman was shot in the upper back while fleeing. Her friends later found her unresponsive. The 18-year-old New York native was only a few months away from completing her freshman year at Loyola.
The charging document also revealed that the firearm Medina-Medina allegedly used was illegally purchased around February 6, 2008, from a Federal Firearms Licensee in Montgomery, Alabama. How a gun bought in Alabama nearly two decades ago ended up in the hands of a 25-year-old Venezuelan illegal immigrant on a Chicago pier remains an open question, one federal investigators have not publicly answered.
The case fits a grim pattern of violent crimes committed by individuals who entered the country illegally and were released, as seen in other recent fugitive apprehensions tied to murder charges.
Sheridan Gorman’s family attended the court hearing via Zoom, alongside friends. Their public statement after federal charges were filed was measured but unmistakable. They described listening to the defense’s arguments and offered a response that cut through the legal maneuvering:
“We sat in a courtroom and listened as the person accused of taking Sheridan’s life was described through the lens of his background, his circumstances, and his struggles. We heard a call for compassion. And we understand that instinct. Every life has a story. But we cannot lose sight of the simple, devastating truth at the center of all of this: Sheridan had a life too.”
They also said:
“Sheridan was a real person, she had a future, a family, and a life full of promise.”
The family expressed gratitude for law enforcement coordination and added a line that should weigh on every official who had a hand in Medina-Medina’s release, his unserved warrant, or the sanctuary policies that shielded him from deportation:
“If there is any purpose to be found in this loss, it is that no other family should have to endure what we are living through now.”
The Gorman case has drawn sharp political attention. Border Czar Tom Homan cited the shooting as an example of why the Trump administration wants to dismantle sanctuary city policies. As Just The News reported, Homan told NewsNation:
“President Trump wants to take sanctuary cities on, and we’re going to continue taking them on. We’ve got to end sanctuary city policies, because doing so will save thousands, thousands of lives.”
National Review reported that several media outlets downplayed or omitted Medina-Medina’s immigration status entirely, identifying him only as a “Rogers Park man”, a framing choice that obscured the central policy failure at the heart of the case.
Acting Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Lauren Bis did not mince words. The Washington Times quoted her saying: “Sheridan Gorman had her whole life ahead of her before this cold-blooded killer decided to end her life.”
Lay out the sequence and the failure becomes impossible to miss. A Venezuelan national enters the country illegally in 2023. He is apprehended and released. He lives in a city-sponsored migrant shelter. He is arrested for shoplifting, released again, and skips his court dates. An active warrant goes unserved. No one deports him. No one detains him. And on a March night, an 18-year-old college freshman is shot in the back while running for her life.
Federal prosecutors now hold a firearm charge that carries up to a decade in prison. State prosecutors hold murder and attempted murder counts. A judge has ordered detention. But all of this comes after the fact, after every safeguard that was supposed to protect the public failed, one by one, in predictable sequence.
Sheridan Gorman’s family asked that no other family endure what they are living through. That is not a partisan request. It is a basic demand for a system that works. Right now, in Chicago, the federal government has to file its own charges just to make sure a murder suspect stays behind bars.
When the feds have to backstop your local courts on a murder case, the problem is no longer one bad actor. It is the policy that let him stay.
By signing up, you agree to receive our newsletters and promotional content and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.