Cleveland Clinic has agreed to stop performing transgender-related medical procedures on patients younger than 18 as part of a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Ohio Attorney General’s Office. The deal also resolves allegations that the hospital system submitted false billing codes to Ohio Medicaid for years.
Under the settlement, Cleveland Clinic will pay $308,000 to resolve the false billing claims and commit an additional $2 million toward care for people who have detransitioned after receiving transgender-related medical services, Breitbart News reported. The agreement marks the second major DOJ settlement with a prominent hospital system over transgender procedures performed on children.
The terms go well beyond a simple fine. Cleveland Clinic is now forbidden from providing puberty blockers, hormone treatments, or any other transgender-related services to minors. It may not refer minors for those procedures, coordinate such services through third parties, or own or operate facilities that provide them. The settlement’s language describes the covered procedures as “sex-rejecting procedures.”
Federal and state officials allege Cleveland Clinic used diagnosis codes for unspecified endocrine disorders rather than codes that would more accurately reflect the reasons for the procedures. The alleged false billing to Ohio Medicaid dates back to January 1, 2020, and involved transgender- and gender identity-related services provided to minors.
Cleveland Clinic characterized the issue differently. The hospital told WKYC the matter was “an unintentional coding issue involving a small number of patients.”
“We are pleased to have worked collaboratively toward a resolution. We remain focused on providing exceptional care to our patients and communities. We have complied and will continue to comply with all federal and state laws.”
That framing, “unintentional” and “small”, sits uneasily beside a settlement that imposes sweeping restrictions on an entire category of medical services and requires a combined $2.3 million in payments and commitments. Hospitals do not typically agree to permanent bans on a line of care over minor paperwork mistakes.
The Justice Department made clear this settlement is not an isolated case. Officials said the agreement stems from an ongoing nationwide investigation into health providers offering transgender-related medical services to minors.
Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward framed the action as a matter of child protection:
“The Department of Justice is steadfastly committed to protecting America’s children. Just as the resolution with Texas Children’s, today’s resolution with Cleveland Clinic furthers that commitment and puts these providers on notice that this Department will vigorously enforce federal law where children are put at risk.”
The DOJ also gave Cleveland Clinic some credit for cooperation, stating the hospital system “took significant steps entitling it to credit for cooperation with the Department in its investigation.” Officials described Cleveland Clinic as “cooperative, proactive, and solution-driven” throughout the process, highlighting the $2 million commitment to detransitioner care.
That cooperation may explain why Cleveland Clinic’s financial penalty looks modest compared to the one imposed on Texas Children’s Hospital. Last month, the DOJ revealed Texas Children’s had agreed to pay a $10 million fine, permanently ban what the settlement terms “sex-rejecting medical procedures” on minors, and establish what was described as the first clinic of its kind dedicated to treating detransitioners.
Two major hospital systems. Two settlements. Both include permanent bans on transgender procedures for minors. Both include financial penalties tied to billing practices. Both come from the same federal investigation.
Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate left no doubt about the DOJ’s trajectory:
“I am grateful for this resolution with Cleveland Clinic, but our work is far from over. Our division will continue to work tirelessly to protect America’s children and hold accountable those that have preyed on vulnerable children, whether they be pharmaceutical companies or medical providers.”
That last phrase, “pharmaceutical companies or medical providers”, suggests the investigation’s scope extends beyond hospitals. Drug manufacturers that produce puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones may face their own scrutiny.
Ohio law currently does not allow transgender-related medical procedures for minors, which raises its own questions about why a settlement was necessary to achieve a ban the state already imposed. The billing allegations provide one answer: the false coding scheme allegedly allowed Cleveland Clinic to bill Ohio Medicaid for services that may not have been properly identified.
If the hospital was coding transgender-related procedures as treatment for “unspecified endocrine disorders,” Medicaid would have processed the claims without flagging them as procedures that state law restricted. The coding issue, in other words, may have been the mechanism by which prohibited services continued to receive public funding.
Cleveland Clinic insists the coding was unintentional. The DOJ’s settlement terms, which ban not just the procedures but also referrals, third-party coordination, and facility ownership connected to those services, suggest federal investigators saw something more systematic.
The settlement leaves several questions unresolved. How many minors received transgender-related procedures at Cleveland Clinic? The hospital says “a small number,” but no specific figure has been disclosed. How long does the ban last? The settlement’s duration is not specified in available reporting. And what specific diagnosis codes were used in place of the accurate ones?
The $2 million commitment to detransitioner care also raises a practical question: how many former patients need that care, and what does it look like? The Texas Children’s settlement included a dedicated clinic, the first of its kind. Cleveland Clinic’s commitment appears to be financial rather than structural, but the details remain thin.
For years, major medical institutions raced to establish gender clinics for minors, often presenting puberty blockers and hormone treatments as settled, reversible, and medically necessary. Critics warned that the evidence base was thin, the long-term consequences unknown, and the rush to treat children reckless. Those critics were dismissed as bigots or alarmists.
Now two of the country’s most prominent hospital systems have signed federal settlements that ban the very procedures they once offered. Both face allegations of billing fraud connected to those services. And the DOJ says it is not finished.
Cleveland Clinic wants this treated as a minor coding hiccup. The settlement’s terms tell a different story, one of a hospital system agreeing to sweeping restrictions on how it treats children, backed by millions of dollars in penalties and commitments. Hospitals do not pay that price for typos.
When institutions that billed themselves as following the science agree to stop performing procedures on children and start paying for the consequences, the rest of us are entitled to ask what the science actually said, and who was listening.
By signing up, you agree to receive newsletters and promotional content from American Frontline News and selected publications in the American Digest Media Network, operated with Patriot Mom Digest LLC, and you accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
By signing up, you agree to receive newsletters and promotional content from American Frontline News and selected publications in the American Digest Media Network, operated with Patriot Mom Digest LLC, and you accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.