The Justice Department sent a letter to Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett on April 14 demanding roughly 865,000 ballots and hundreds of thousands of related election records from the November 2024 federal election, and warned that a failure to comply within 14 days could trigger a federal court order.
Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon, who leads the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, made the request under federal records-retention law. The demand covers “all ballots (including absentee and provisional), ballot receipts, and ballot envelopes” from Wayne County, which includes Detroit, Michigan’s largest city. Dhillon cited a “history of fraud convictions and other allegations” in the area as grounds for the inquiry, Fox News Digital reported.
The letter stated that noncompliance “may result in the United States seeking a court order for production of such records.” That language leaves little room for ambiguity: turn the materials over voluntarily, or face a judge.
Michigan’s top Democratic officials responded with a wall of resistance. Attorney General Dana Nessel wrote a separate letter calling the DOJ request a “fishing expedition” and “an unwarranted intrusion into Michigan elections.” She told The Washington Post her office was ready for a fight.
“If this administration wants to bring this circus to our state, my office is prepared to protect the people’s right to vote.”
Nessel also argued the DOJ sent its demand to the wrong office. She wrote that the ballots in question are held by 43 municipal clerks across Wayne County, not by the county clerk herself. She further contended that “the process worked” in the 2024 election and that the federal request would burden local election officials ahead of the state’s Aug. 2 primary, which she said was just over three months away.
Governor Gretchen Whitmer dismissed the DOJ’s move as a “poorly disguised attempt to justify more doubt and misinformation about our elections.” Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson described it as the administration’s “latest attempt to interfere in our elections.”
The coordinated response from three statewide Democratic officials, attorney general, governor, and secretary of state, was swift and politically unified. What it did not include was any explanation of why turning over lawfully retained public records to the federal government would harm voters.
The Wayne County demand is part of a much larger DOJ campaign. Dhillon said on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” with Maria Bartiromo that she had requested voter rolls from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. About a third of those states have voluntarily complied or reached settlements, she said. The rest are fighting.
“I’m suing 29 states and the District of Columbia for their refusal to give us the voter rolls to which the attorney general or the acting attorney general is entitled under the Civil Rights Act of 1960. We’re doing that to make sure that states are in compliance.”
The results from the states that have cooperated paint a troubling picture. Dhillon said the DOJ found “at least 350,000 dead people currently on the voter rolls in those jurisdictions.” She added that approximately 25,000 people with no citizenship records had been referred to Homeland Security for further review.
Those numbers, from only a fraction of the country, suggest the scale of voter-roll contamination nationwide could be far larger. And they raise an obvious question: if the states that cooperated had rolls this dirty, what do the rolls look like in the 29 states that refused?
The broader fight over federal authority in election administration has intensified in recent months, with Democratic lawmakers and state officials challenging the administration’s oversight efforts in court and in public.
Dhillon was blunt about what the data shows. She said she had been in touch with voting-rights activists who provided information about noncitizens who voted. She pointed to a recent indictment in Minnesota involving someone who allegedly voted without being a citizen.
“So the left told us, this never happens. And it’s a myth. It definitely happened just recently, someone was indicted in Minnesota, of all places, for voting without being a citizen.”
Dhillon also singled out Minnesota’s “vouching law,” which allows citizens to vouch for each other’s citizenship at the polls. She called it “crazy and inconsistent with the Help America Vote Act” and pledged the DOJ would not rest until the project was complete.
On X, Dhillon posted video of her Fox News appearance and wrote that “ensuring election integrity is a paramount duty” at the Justice Department. She added that “many states fail to clean noncitizen & deceased people from their voter rolls” and that the Civil Rights Division under her leadership would “continue working to ensure that ONLY eligible American citizens vote in our elections.”
The administration’s push to secure the ballot box parallels other efforts, including the president’s insistence on the SAVE America Act, which would tighten citizenship verification requirements for voter registration.
Detroit and Wayne County are not random targets. The area has a documented record of election disputes that stretches back years. In 2020, Wayne County’s Board of Canvassers initially deadlocked 2-2 along party lines, temporarily blocking certification of the November 3 election results. The two Republican members cited discrepancies in absentee ballot poll books in many Detroit precincts, Just The News reported.
Board Chairwoman Monica Palmer said at the time: “We do not have complete and accurate information in those poll books.” The two Republican canvassers later reversed course after intense public pressure and agreed to certify, but only with a demand that the Secretary of State’s office conduct a “comprehensive audit” of precincts with unexplained out-of-balance tallies.
That audit demand was tied to real concerns. Breitbart reported that the certification resolution called for a comprehensive review of jurisdictions with unexplained absentee-ballot discrepancies. Just The News also referenced an affidavit from Detroit election worker Jessy Jacob, who said she witnessed and was instructed to backdate absentee ballots after Election Day and believed thousands of ballots had been altered.
A 2020 lawsuit against Detroit and Wayne County over absentee-ballot handling was later dismissed, with a judge finding the allegations were not credible. But the underlying pattern, irregularities raised, pressure applied, concerns dismissed, and no thorough independent accounting, is precisely the kind of cycle that erodes public trust.
Dhillon’s letter signals that the current Justice Department is not content to let that cycle repeat. The DOJ’s earlier moves involved 2020 ballots in Georgia and election records in Arizona, making the Wayne County request part of a deliberate, multi-state effort.
The question of how the federal government uses its subpoena and records-demand authority has been a flashpoint in recent years, with both parties claiming the other side weaponizes legal tools for political advantage.
Nessel’s objection that the DOJ sent its letter to the wrong office, the county clerk rather than the 43 municipal clerks who hold the ballots, may have procedural merit. But it also reads as a roadblock dressed up as a technicality. If the goal were transparency, the attorney general could direct those 43 clerks to cooperate. Instead, she chose confrontation.
Whitmer and Benson joined the chorus without offering any substantive reason why federal review of lawfully retained election records would threaten voters. The claim that the request amounts to “interference” assumes that outside review is inherently illegitimate, a position that benefits only those who prefer no one look too closely.
Dhillon also used her Sunday appearance to address the prior administration’s conduct, saying the DOJ intended to “ensure accountability for the outrageous weaponization of the deep state against President Trump and his team.” She added simply: “It must never be repeated!”
The pattern of federal authorities pursuing accountability against officials who resist oversight is not new, but the scale of the current voter-roll effort, 29 lawsuits, 350,000 dead registrants found so far, 25,000 referrals to Homeland Security, suggests the administration views election integrity as a long-term enforcement priority, not a one-off headline.
Several important details remain unclear. The specific federal records-retention statute Dhillon cited in her letter has not been publicly identified. It is not yet known which court the DOJ would approach for an order if Wayne County refuses. And Nessel’s responsive letter did not specify whether she would advise the 43 municipal clerks to comply or resist.
The 14-day deadline means the next move could come soon. If Wayne County stonewalls, the confrontation will shift to federal court, and the question will become whether a judge agrees that the federal government has the right to inspect the records of an election it helped administer.
When officials who claim elections are clean fight this hard to keep anyone from checking, the public has every reason to wonder what the ballots would show.
By signing up, you agree to receive our newsletters and promotional content and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.