A 44-year-old man armed with a machete slashed three elderly people inside one of New York City’s busiest transit hubs Saturday morning before NYPD officers shot and killed him on the platform, police said. The suspect, identified as Anthony Griffin, allegedly ignored more than 20 commands to drop his weapon, told officers he was “Lucifer,” and advanced toward them with the blade extended.
The attack unfolded around 9:40 a.m. at the 42nd Street, Grand Central subway station beneath Grand Central Terminal in Midtown Manhattan. Officers responding to a 911 assault-in-progress call found three victims bleeding on the platform and confronted Griffin, who was still armed and behaving erratically, Fox News reported.
The victims, an 84-year-old man, a 65-year-old man, and a 70-year-old woman, were rushed to area hospitals. All three were listed in stable condition with injuries police described as serious but not life-threatening. Griffin was shot twice by a single detective and later died, according to multiple reports.
NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch laid out the sequence at a press briefing. Two detectives assigned to transit security encountered Griffin on the platform. They ordered him repeatedly to put down the machete. He refused every time.
Tisch told reporters, as AP News reported:
“Our officers were confronted with an armed individual who had already injured multiple people and was continuing to pose a threat. They gave clear commands. They attempted to de-escalate. And when that threat did not stop, they took decisive action to stop it and to protect New Yorkers on one of the busiest train platforms in the city.”
One officer fired two rounds after Griffin moved toward the detectives with the machete raised, Tisch said. No bystanders were struck.
The commissioner also described Griffin’s demeanor during the confrontation. He was “behaving erratically, repeatedly stating that he was Lucifer,” she said. That detail, a suspect openly claiming a demonic identity while brandishing a large blade on a crowded Saturday morning platform, will raise familiar questions about how New York handles the dangerously mentally ill on its streets and in its transit system.
Gov. Kathy Hochul responded on X, calling the attack a “senseless act of violence.” She said she was “grateful to our brave officers who acted quickly to stop the suspect,” the Washington Times reported.
The phrase “senseless act of violence” has become a reflex for New York officials after subway attacks. Riders and commuters may find the words less comforting each time they hear them. Grand Central Terminal is not some neglected outer-borough stop. It sits at the geographic and symbolic center of the city’s transit network, handling hundreds of thousands of passengers daily.
The three victims were older New Yorkers doing nothing more than riding the train on a Saturday morning. An 84-year-old man. A 70-year-old woman. A 65-year-old man. None of them could reasonably have defended themselves against an attacker swinging a machete. That they survived owes more to luck and fast medical response than to any system designed to keep them safe.
Violent crime on the New York subway has been a persistent concern in recent years, and random attacks by disturbed individuals have driven ridership fears that city leaders have struggled to address. The pattern is depressingly familiar: a suspect with apparent mental health issues carries out a brazen assault in a public space, officers respond after the damage is done, and officials call the result “senseless” before moving on. Incidents like the recent killing of a seven-month-old girl by a stray bullet in Brooklyn reinforce how routine serious violence has become in New York’s public spaces.
Authorities had not publicly disclosed a motive as of Saturday. Investigators were still working to determine whether Griffin’s rampage began aboard a train or on the platform itself. No criminal charges were announced before Griffin died, and it remains unclear whether he had a prior criminal record or history of mental health contacts with the city.
The NYPD did not say how Griffin obtained the machete or how he entered the station with it. New York’s transit system has no routine weapons screening for passengers, a point that surfaces after every subway attack and is quietly shelved each time.
Tisch acknowledged the broader anxiety the attack would cause. She told the New York Post:
“Random acts of violence scare everyone. Anyone can be a victim of random violence.”
That candor from the city’s top cop is notable, and damning. When the police commissioner herself frames the situation as one in which “anyone” can be a victim at any time, it amounts to an admission that the system cannot guarantee basic safety in public transit.
Credit where it is due: the two NYPD detectives on that platform performed exactly as trained. They confronted an armed, erratic suspect. They gave him every chance to comply, more than 20 verbal commands, by the department’s own count. When Griffin advanced with the machete, one officer fired twice and stopped the threat. No innocent bystanders were hit. The three victims survived.
But the officers’ competence in the moment does not answer the harder question: why was Anthony Griffin on that platform with a machete in the first place? What combination of failed intervention, inadequate mental health infrastructure, or revolving-door policy allowed a man who would announce himself as “Lucifer” to walk into Grand Central Terminal armed and ready to slash strangers?
New York’s leaders have spent years debating how to handle the intersection of mental illness and public safety. Outgoing and incoming administrations alike have promised more psychiatric beds, more outreach teams, more involuntary removals of dangerous individuals from the subway. The results speak for themselves, in machete wounds on three senior citizens who just wanted to ride the train.
Across the country, similar failures play out in different forms. In Washington state, police recently arrested a 19-time convicted felon after a high-speed chase, another case where a dangerous individual remained free long enough to threaten the public again.
The pattern extends well beyond New York’s borders. In Chicago, federal prosecutors stepped in to charge a suspect in a student’s killing after expressing a lack of confidence in local courts, a sign of how deeply the accountability gap runs in major American cities.
Breitbart News reported the basic details of the attack, citing CNN and PIX11 for the sequence of events and victim descriptions. The broader picture assembled from multiple outlets paints a grim Saturday morning at one of America’s most iconic transit stations.
Governor Hochul’s word, “senseless”, deserves a second look. It implies the attack had no logic, no pattern, no systemic cause. It frames the event as random misfortune, like a lightning strike. That framing lets every institution off the hook.
But a man walking into Grand Central Terminal with a machete and slashing elderly strangers is not a weather event. It is the downstream result of choices, choices about who gets confined, who gets treatment, who gets released, and who gets left to wander armed through a city of eight million people. When alleged gang members face federal trial for 11 killings across multiple states, at least the system is finally catching up. In cases like Saturday’s attack, it never caught up at all.
Three elderly New Yorkers are in the hospital. The man who attacked them is dead. The officers who stopped him did their job. The question, as always, is whether anyone upstream of that platform will do theirs.
By signing up, you agree to receive our newsletters and promotional content and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.