White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt demanded Thursday that ABC News retract a story about a possible Iranian drone threat to California, a story that left out one critical word from the FBI’s own alert: “unverified.”
The dust-up started Wednesday, when ABC News posted a breathless bulletin claiming the FBI had warned California police departments that Iran wanted to launch offensive drones against the West Coast. The network framed it as a confirmed threat. It wasn’t.
ABC’s original post declared: “BREAKING: The FBI has warned police departments in California that Iran wants to retaliate for American attacks by launching offensive drones against the West Coast, according to an alert reviewed by @ABC News.” The language suggested an active, verified danger.
But the actual FBI alert told a different story. As Fox News Digital reported, the bureau’s bulletin to Joint Terrorism Task Force partners clearly labeled the underlying intelligence as unverified. ABC stripped that qualifier out.
FBI Assistant Director for Public Affairs Ben Williamson highlighted the gap:
“On the left is the way ABC (or their source) reported the FBI alert. On the right is the actual FBI alert that went to JTFF partners. You will notice the word left out, ‘Unverified.'”
Leavitt retweeted Williamson’s side-by-side comparison and unloaded on the network:
“They wrote this based on one email that was sent to local law enforcement in California about a single, unverified tip. The email even states the tip was based on *unverified* intelligence. Yet ABC News left out this critical fact in their story! WHY?”
Leavitt didn’t stop at criticism. She called for ABC to pull the story entirely:
“This post and story should be immediately retracted by ABC News for providing false information to intentionally alarm the American people.”
She added a flat denial of any active threat:
“TO BE CLEAR: No such threat from Iran to our homeland exists, and it never did.”
ABC News eventually tacked on an editor’s note conceding the omission: “The FBI has posted a fuller version of its alert to California authorities, which includes that the information was unverified. The latest version of this story has been updated with the full statement.” That’s a long way from a retraction.
The underlying intelligence, while alarming in the abstract, came wrapped in caveats. Just The News reported that the FBI alert stated Iran “allegedly aspired as of early February 2026 to conduct a surprise attack using unmanned aerial vehicles from an unidentified vessel off the coast of the United States Homeland, specifically against unspecified targets in California, in the event that the US conducted strikes against Iran.”
Key details the alert itself flagged:
The Washington Times noted that law enforcement sources told the Los Angeles Times the intelligence was “not considered credible at this time” and described such alerts as cautionary. That context matters, and ABC News left all of it on the cutting-room floor.
The Washington Examiner reported that the FBI had warned California’s governor and law enforcement agencies in late February about the possible Iranian drone scenario. A spokesperson for Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state “has elevated its security posture since the start of the conflict in the Middle East.”
Newsmax reported that DHS had already warned of a “heightened threat environment in the United States” tied to the Iran conflict and assessed that Iran and its proxies remain capable of asymmetric retaliatory attacks on American soil.
Nobody disputes that the FBI circulated a cautionary bulletin. The question is whether a major news network should have turned an unverified, conditional tip into a screaming “BREAKING” headline.
President Donald Trump was asked about the report on Wednesday. His response was measured:
“It’s being investigated. But you have a lot of things happening, and all we can do is take them as they come, and the war itself is being prosecuted as well as anybody has ever seen.”
That’s the posture of a commander-in-chief dealing with real threats, not manufacturing panic from raw, unverified intelligence.
Dropping the word “unverified” from an FBI alert isn’t a small editing choice. It transforms a cautionary law-enforcement memo into a confirmed national-security emergency. The difference between “Iran aspires to attack” and “Iran wants to attack” is the difference between a tip and a threat, and ABC chose the version that would generate maximum fear.
An editor’s note buried after the damage is done doesn’t fix the problem. Millions of Americans saw the original post. The alarm spread. The correction whispered.
When the press treats unverified intelligence as confirmed fact, it doesn’t inform the public, it weaponizes fear. And when the same outlets demand trust, they might start by earning it.
By signing up, you agree to receive our newsletters and promotional content and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.